Skip to content

Lessons Learned from Building an Event-Driven Geospatial Data Pipeline

Introduction

This page highlights the technical challenges, design decisions, and key insights gained while developing the event-driven geospatial data pipeline.

It also includes recommendations for future improvements and practical advice for replicating or extending the setup.

Key Technical Insights

Event Source Configuration

Challenge: Configuring Redis as a reliable event source for Argo Events.

Insight: * Redis' Pub/Sub feature proved effective but required careful setup to ensure scalability. * The use of clear naming conventions for Redis channels (e.g., stac-events) simplified debugging.

Jetstream Event Bus

Challenge: Ensuring reliable and performant event routing.

Insight: * Jetstream’s integration with Argo Events offers a robust event-driven architecture. * It is crucial to define clear message schemas for event payloads to maintain consistency.

Workflow Scalability

Challenge: Managing workflows triggered by multiple simultaneous events.

Insight: * Argo Workflows scales effectively but requires resource limits and quotas to prevent cluster overload. * Using parameterized templates enabled workflows to process diverse input data dynamically.

Design Decisions

Separation of Concerns

Decision: Use Argo Events exclusively for orchestration and delegate processing to workflows.

Outcome: * Simplified troubleshooting by isolating event-handling logic from data processing logic.

Modular Workflow Templates

Decision: Separate the CWL execution and water bodies detection into distinct workflow templates.

Outcome: * Enhanced reusability for other geospatial pipelines requiring similar preprocessing steps.

STAC Integration

Decision: Leverage the STAC API for querying and storing geospatial data.

Outcome: * Improved interoperability with other geospatial tools and standards.

Challenges and Solutions

Handling Event Storms

Challenge: Preventing resource exhaustion during high-frequency event generation.

Solution: * Introduced rate-limiting on the Redis event source and implemented a backoff mechanism.

Debugging Workflow Failures

Challenge: Diagnosing failures in complex workflows with multiple steps.

Solution: * Enabled Argo Workflows’ artifact repository to store intermediate outputs and logs for analysis.

Maintaining Consistency in Results

Challenge: Ensuring consistent outputs across diverse input datasets.

Solution: * Developed unit tests for the CWL pipeline and water bodies detection algorithm. * Validated results against a benchmark dataset during development.

Conclusion

Using Kubernetes-native tools like Argo Workflows and Argo Events, this setup demonstrates how to create a real-time processing system that aligns with modern cloud-native practices.